How Changes to Section 230 Could Affect AI Innovation
In the last few months, services based on Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), have spread across the […]
Disruptive Competition Project
655 15th St., NW
Suite 410
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 783-0070
Fax: (202) 783-0534
Category
Supreme Court
In the last few months, services based on Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), have spread across the […]
Without the longstanding interpretation of Section 230 as providing broad protections to digital intermediaries and their users, the digital economy, built on user interactions with an enormous variety of content, could not continue to exist.
A generation after a law that made online commentary possible, long-standing rules of the road online have become a political football.
In the second round of amicus briefs filed this week with the Supreme Court in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, […]
In the first round of amicus briefs filed last week with the Supreme Court in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, […]
Update: On February 24, 2022, Justice Breyer wrote the opinion for the Court in Unicolors v. H&M in favor of the […]
When courts decide issues applying the law to technology, too often they resort to metaphors for the analog world, or […]
This is a cross-post from Patent Progress by Joshua Landau. Joshua Landau is the Patent Counsel at the Computer & […]
In policy discussions, rightsholders often claim that the fair use right, 17 U.S.C. § 107, undermines the incentive to create […]
The software industry issued a collective sigh of relief after this week’s Supreme Court decision in Google v. Oracle finding […]