Contact Us

Disruptive Competition Project

655 15th St., NW

Suite 410

Washington, D.C. 20005

Phone: (202) 783-0070
Fax: (202) 783-0534

Contact Us

Please fill out this form and we will get in touch with you shortly.

An EU Inconvenient Truth: Digital Companies Pay More Tax Than Traditional Companies

Digital companies are not paying their fair share of taxes, the European mantra goes.  The European Commissioner responsible for taxation, Pierre Moscovici, recently stated that “digitalised business models are subject to an effective tax rate of only 9% … Less than half compared to traditional business models.”  Moscovici will, for this reason, on 21 March present new tax proposals aimed at companies’ “digital activities” (whatever that means).

The inconvenient truth is, however, that digital companies pay a higher effective corporate tax rate than traditional companies.  Digital companies’ real effective corporate tax rates are many times higher than the Commission’s estimated 9%.  Digital companies pay, on average, between 26.8% to 29.4%, according to a new study from the think tank ECIPE (see figure below).  

Source: “Digital Companies and Their Fair Share of Taxes: Myths and Misconceptions”, ECIPE, 2018

Source: “Digital Companies and Their Fair Share of Taxes: Myths and Misconceptions”, ECIPE, 2018

The author of the Commission’s own research, Professor Christoph Spengel, also criticises Moscovici’s assertion; “It is not correct to state that the digital sector is undertaxed.” Other studies have previously come to a similar conclusion.

Yet, the European Commissioner seems dead set on imposing a new tax regime targeting (mostly foreign) digital companies.  By doing so, the Commission also ignores its own expert group on taxation of the digital economy which concluded that “there should not be a special tax regime for digital companies.”

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the leading inter-governmental organisation in this debate, has concluded that it “would be difficult, if not impossible, to ‘ring-fence’ the digital economy from the rest of the economy for tax purposes”.  The OECD’s Secretary General recently warned against “the political pressure” behind the European digital tax push and instead called for a global, comprehensive solution.

The political winds are with Commissioner Moscovici, yet his proposals run counter to the EU’s commitment to evidence-based policy making.  More importantly, misidentifying the root problem could make it more difficult to reach a workable, global solution to update international tax frameworks to the digital age.

Making tax systems fair and just for the digital world is a good thing.  In doing that the EU should bear a few principles in mind: reforms should avoid unintended consequences that distort trade away from EU businesses thus reducing overall EU tax take; they should focus on profit not revenue; and they should not damage that other social good, investment.


New technologies are constantly emerging that promise to change our lives for the better. These disruptive technologies give us an increase in choice, make technologies more accessible, make things more affordable, and give consumers a voice. And the pace of innovation has only quickened in recent years, as the Internet has enabled a wave of new, inter-connected devices that have benefited consumers around the world, seemingly in all aspects of their lives. Preserving an innovation-friendly market is, therefore, tantamount not only to businesses but society at large.

European Union

DisCo is dedicated to examining technology and policy at a global scale.  Developments in the European Union play a considerable role in shaping both European and global technology markets.  EU regulations related to copyright, competition, privacy, innovation, and trade all affect the international development of technology and tech markets.