Moody & Paxton Oral Arguments: What Others Are Saying
On Monday February 26, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court held oral arguments in two cases that will undoubtedly impact the […]
Category
Section 230
Online Speech in the Supreme Court
This Monday, February 26, 2024, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in two cases — Moody v. […]
ICYMI: Expert Panel Concerned Upcoming Supreme Court Decision Could Harm Internet Users, Free Expression, and Digital Economy
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is widely regarded as “the most important law in tech.” Within […]
How Changes to Section 230 Could Affect AI Innovation
In the last few months, services based on Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), have spread across the […]
A Ruling Against Google in Gonzalez Could Create a “World of Lawsuits” and “Economic Dislocation”
Without the longstanding interpretation of Section 230 as providing broad protections to digital intermediaries and their users, the digital economy, built on user interactions with an enormous variety of content, could not continue to exist.
Fate of Internet May Hang With Supreme Court Case
Scores of briefs were filed last month in a closely watched Supreme Court case by parties with a stake in what has been called “the most important law in tech.”
Supreme Court to Hear First Ever Section 230 Case
A generation after a law that made online commentary possible, long-standing rules of the road online have become a political football.
Internet Users at Risk from State-by-State Regulation of Internet Content Moderation
Amid an ongoing federal conversation about digital services’ content moderation, several state policymakers are pursuing legislation on content moderation. Last […]
2020’s Noteworthy Content
The Disruptive Competition Project covered a wide range of topics in 2020 but certain subjects stood out, both new issues […]
What the Bostock Decision Teaches About Section 230
Earlier this summer, in Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga. the Supreme Court voted 6-3 in favor of an interpretation of […]
Popular Articles
-
Flaws Remain in Amended California Journalism Preservation Act
-
Facing Disruption, Newspapers Demand Right to Collude
-
The Internet Isn’t Harmful to Your Mental Health, Oxford Study Finds
-
Motherless Repairs Some of Mavrix Damage
-
FTC v. Amazon: Why a Properly Defined Market Is Important in Antitrust Analysis
